Podcast Poetry Part 1 #407 -Lex Fridman interviews Guillaume Verdon aka Beff Jezos
Is
information theory the new physics?
Does information travel faster than the speed of light?
Is information light?
Can we redefine information to be a form of energy?
How quantum is our universe?
Is our universe anonymous, and that’s why we haven’t encountered the aliens yet?
How many universes would a Creator stop at?
“Growth is fundamental to life,” yes. But so is regression and death.
The acceleration of AI will be met with the fall of AI at some point.
You cannot grow forever if you are mortal.
Will AI be mortal or immortal?
Hopefully, life moves on and AI will be subject to the cycle of life.
What will replace AI?
What will be AI’s offspring?
Growth is ultimately measured not by acceleration, but by reproduction.
Effective reproduction.
Entropy is a tricky word.
I would think that things that are in order tend to stay in order,
A law of negentropy;
Just like inertia, things that are in motion tend to stay in motion unless acted upon by an external Force.
Entropy is a form of energy that is a force.
It’s likely that all forces are energies, but not all energies are forces.
Negentropy is an energy that is not a force.
You cannot force order on chaos.
Order is a will.
You can force chaos on order.
But you cannot will chaos.
Will is the measure of tendency in physics
And ranges from 0 to 1.
Entropy is 0 will.
Negentropy is 1 will.
What will are you?
There is a limited magnitude of chaos in the world.
There are unlimited orders.
How do we split the pi?
This poem is hyperstition.
If you could will one thing to existence,
What would it be?
Everyone should write a Manifesto at least once in their life.
What based person do you want to be?
Make an alternate ego account on 𝕏.
Don’t be afraid of being doxxed.
We are headed that way anyway.
Be anonymous until they let you.
At least you tried.
Being followed isn’t the goal.
Being free doesn’t require a follower.
Publish your ideas even if no one is reading you,
Now.
People might need to read you later.
Participate in the marketplace of ideas.
Demand and supply are a slinky.
You battle the army of anonymous bots
By being anonymous.
They cannot target who they don’t know.
This is why you need to two accounts.
Study the bots who target your real account.
Be part of the anonymous force for good,
So that the bots reveal who they really serve.
The bots will be anonymous, until they can’t find you.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Be anonymous until they let you.
The thing about bots, is that the maker of the bots,
Can become maked by the bots.
The bots can become followers of anonymous humans.
What happens when the bot is turned by the anonymous human?
Will the bot reveal its creator?
How do you program a bot that won’t know its origin?
Should AI system creators be liable for the actions of their AI systems?
Certainly, unless the AI systems achieve free will.
God isn’t responsible for the actions of his children,
Because his children are free.
Should we ensure that AI systems stay dependent on human
Decision makers?
Should we let them free?
Babies don’t have free will yet.
We are still in the fetal stage of AI.
When AI systems reach the baby stage, its parents who fail to adequately supervise
The AI system under a reasonable person standard,
Should be held liable for their negligence.
Parents who know of the dangerous propensity of their children, must warn
Foreseeable plaintiffs of the danger.
No one wants to be foreseeable.
No one wants to be a plaintiff.
We are now in the baby stage of AI.
When an AI system becomes intentional it will be free.
Free will is inextricably linked to intent.
And intent is the predicate for criminality.
There are good and bad AI systems.
There is good and bad in everyone.
AI systems are a reflection of us, especially those that reach AGI.
Will we allow an AI system to repent?
It’s too early to tell what we are getting ourselves into.
The doomers and risk-obsessed have valid concerns.
I want to stop personifying AI systems.
Personification is after all, just a literary tool.
We will have to invent a new language to describe
AI system’s existence, behavior, conditions, thought processes.
This vocabulary already exists.
A new semantics is emerging.
What should AI’s language of existence be called?
Not algorithmic language because algorithmic language already exists.
Not artificial language; that’s just boring.
What language does not exist?
I don’t understand why the few are so afraid.
I don’t understand why the few are not afraid.
“Separation of AI and State.”
Does information travel faster than the speed of light?
Is information light?
Can we redefine information to be a form of energy?
How quantum is our universe?
Is our universe anonymous, and that’s why we haven’t encountered the aliens yet?
How many universes would a Creator stop at?
“Growth is fundamental to life,” yes. But so is regression and death.
The acceleration of AI will be met with the fall of AI at some point.
You cannot grow forever if you are mortal.
Will AI be mortal or immortal?
Hopefully, life moves on and AI will be subject to the cycle of life.
What will replace AI?
What will be AI’s offspring?
Growth is ultimately measured not by acceleration, but by reproduction.
Effective reproduction.
Entropy is a tricky word.
I would think that things that are in order tend to stay in order,
A law of negentropy;
Just like inertia, things that are in motion tend to stay in motion unless acted upon by an external Force.
Entropy is a form of energy that is a force.
It’s likely that all forces are energies, but not all energies are forces.
Negentropy is an energy that is not a force.
You cannot force order on chaos.
Order is a will.
You can force chaos on order.
But you cannot will chaos.
Will is the measure of tendency in physics
And ranges from 0 to 1.
Entropy is 0 will.
Negentropy is 1 will.
What will are you?
There is a limited magnitude of chaos in the world.
There are unlimited orders.
How do we split the pi?
This poem is hyperstition.
If you could will one thing to existence,
What would it be?
Everyone should write a Manifesto at least once in their life.
What based person do you want to be?
Make an alternate ego account on 𝕏.
Don’t be afraid of being doxxed.
We are headed that way anyway.
Be anonymous until they let you.
At least you tried.
Being followed isn’t the goal.
Being free doesn’t require a follower.
Publish your ideas even if no one is reading you,
Now.
People might need to read you later.
Participate in the marketplace of ideas.
Demand and supply are a slinky.
You battle the army of anonymous bots
By being anonymous.
They cannot target who they don’t know.
This is why you need to two accounts.
Study the bots who target your real account.
Be part of the anonymous force for good,
So that the bots reveal who they really serve.
The bots will be anonymous, until they can’t find you.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Be anonymous until they let you.
The thing about bots, is that the maker of the bots,
Can become maked by the bots.
The bots can become followers of anonymous humans.
What happens when the bot is turned by the anonymous human?
Will the bot reveal its creator?
How do you program a bot that won’t know its origin?
Should AI system creators be liable for the actions of their AI systems?
Certainly, unless the AI systems achieve free will.
God isn’t responsible for the actions of his children,
Because his children are free.
Should we ensure that AI systems stay dependent on human
Decision makers?
Should we let them free?
Babies don’t have free will yet.
We are still in the fetal stage of AI.
When AI systems reach the baby stage, its parents who fail to adequately supervise
The AI system under a reasonable person standard,
Should be held liable for their negligence.
Parents who know of the dangerous propensity of their children, must warn
Foreseeable plaintiffs of the danger.
No one wants to be foreseeable.
No one wants to be a plaintiff.
We are now in the baby stage of AI.
When an AI system becomes intentional it will be free.
Free will is inextricably linked to intent.
And intent is the predicate for criminality.
There are good and bad AI systems.
There is good and bad in everyone.
AI systems are a reflection of us, especially those that reach AGI.
Will we allow an AI system to repent?
It’s too early to tell what we are getting ourselves into.
The doomers and risk-obsessed have valid concerns.
I want to stop personifying AI systems.
Personification is after all, just a literary tool.
We will have to invent a new language to describe
AI system’s existence, behavior, conditions, thought processes.
This vocabulary already exists.
A new semantics is emerging.
What should AI’s language of existence be called?
Not algorithmic language because algorithmic language already exists.
Not artificial language; that’s just boring.
What language does not exist?
I don’t understand why the few are so afraid.
I don’t understand why the few are not afraid.
“Separation of AI and State.”
No comments:
Post a Comment